On October twenty-eighth of two-thousand and eight I was able to attend the trail of a convicted felon. The trail was entitled a Jimmy Rice trail and was to help determine if the convicted felon was to remain in a corrections facility indefinitely. I do not feel comfortable using the accused name but will use all of the remaining facts I gathered while attending this trail. The judge presiding over this case was J Rogers Padgett and the state attorneys assigned to this case were Anthony Duran and Daniel Ampard while the defense attorneys were Robert Mactavish and Maria Pavlidis. This trail had six jurors in attendance and two different doctors spoke during the trail. While I was not able to obtain the name of the first doctor that spoke the second doctor was Dean Cauley of Port Charlotte Florida. The defendant was originally charged with a sexual offense back on August fifteenth in two-thousand and was charged with a second offense on June thirteenth two-thousand and one. In my opinion the most intriguing part of this trail was not the participants involved instead it was the law being enacted.
What I was able to learn about while attending this trail was the law name the Jimmy Ryce Law. Actually its full name is Jimmy Ryce Involuntary Civil Commitment for Sexual Violent Predators’ Treatment and Care Act. While saying all of that is quite a mouthful what it really is saying is that once a sexual predator is done serving his or her time they actually get sent to a separate facility, usually the Florida Civil Commitment Facility, to stay indefinitely or until they are deemed able to function in society without committing another sexual crime. By many peoples standards this might not seem fair seeing that for a lot of the people in these facilities this law was passed after they were already in jail. No matter if they were in jail before this was passed or not they are still being viewed exactly the same. The process starts by a doctor looking at the inmate and then determining if he or she is a candidate to be moved into one of these facilities upon release. That being said this is simply based on that opinion and their behavior with they time at the jail and there of course is no way to prove if someone will or will not commit another criminal act of a sexual nature. From the view of the defense they are stating that the person was tried and given a sentence which they have now served and it is time for their release. During this trail the state must prove three things: first they must prove that a prior offense occurs, secondly they must prove the person has a mental abnormality, and finally they must prove that this person is likely to commit another sexual related crime. If all of these are done then in all likely hood the person will spend the majority of his or her life at this commitment facility. After having a conversation with Robert Mactavish he was not in favor of this law or trail for that matter. He stated on many occasions the inmates are visited by doctors that have reviewed their cases and are trying to make a determination as to whether to send them to the commitment facility or not. Upon the doctors arrival the inmates sometimes are asked questions about if they have different desires or not and many times the answers to these questions make the case for the doctors.
After seeing this particular trial I am not easily swayed in favor of someone that has been tried and proven guilty. That being said I am not sure if changing a law and making someone stay in jail even after their time is up is the right thing to do. But if this decision is being made by a professional and they believe it is going to prevent something that could destroy another persons life then I am all for it. Overall this trail was very interesting and I must say I felt a bit odd watching all of this unfold. It was very different watching the fate of someone’s life be shaped right in front of my eyes. In addition to that since the original crime happened over eight years ago you tend to look at the side of the person they are trying to keep longer than was originally sentenced and forget that this person just eight short years ago made someone’s life very difficult. Honestly it gave me a lot more respect for the judges and staff that do this each and everyday. In addition to those folks I am now starting to see how difficult it would be to be a reporter on this beat. As I write this piece I wonder to myself how many lives did this person effect and why does he or she ever deserve to be on the streets again. It is very hard to take off your judgmental hat just write about the facts and not interject any opinion of your own. This is an experience I will not soon forget and actual might do again sometime on my own just to learn a little bit more.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Purchasing Process/Hillsborough County Public Schools
In order to find out the purchasing policies and procedures of the Hillsborough County Public Schools system I paid a visit to the General Manager of Procurement, Jean R. Bowman. She was kind enough to take thirty minutes out of her busy schedule to sit down with me and answer a few questions. To get a better understanding of how the whole process works we looked at an example of what is like to make a purchase with all of the schools in the county in mind.
Bowman thought the best case we could look at together would be the purchase of fire extinguishers, which was coded ITB # 8066-DST Fire Extinguishers. The ITB stands for invitation to bid on the purchase which is where we are going to begin. Bowman and her staff maintain a list of all potential bidders by category of commodity and include the names of all persons that request a placement on a particular bid. From that point sealed bids are requested for any single purchase of equipment or service that exceeds the bid amount specified in the State Board of Administration rules. These sealed bids shall be received at the time, date and place designated in the request for bids. Bids that are turned in after the designated time will not be accepted or considered. Each and every bid will be opened publicly by an employee of the school board and then the name of the bidder and the amount will be read aloud. Bowman then must evaluate the competing bids and make a recommendation to the school board for the award of the bid shall sign the tabulation. Under no circumstances will a bid be awarded to any bid other than the lowest and best bid from a quality bidder.
In the case of the fire extinguishers the invitation to bid originally came out on August fifth two-thousand and eight and had a due date of August nineteenth two-thousand and eight. The bid delivery location was the Hillsborough County Public County Schools Procurement Department at nine hundred and one East Kennedy Boulevard on the third floor in Tampa, Florida. All told there were five vendors bidding to provide the fire extinguishers to the Hillsborough County Public Schools. They were, listed in no particular order, as follows: A to Z Fire, All Florida Fire Equipment Company, Fire Master, Piper Fire Protection, and lastly Tampa Bay Fire Equipment, Inc. All of the vendors provided information and pricing on all twenty-eight items that were requested in the bid along with contact names and numbers to ask any questions about their offers. At the end of the day the lowest and best bid came from All Florida Fire Equipment Company out of St. Petersburg Florida. The final act to make this entire process official was for the Superintendent of schools, MaryEllen Eila to bring this to the Hillsborough County School Board for approval. That very thing happened on Tuesday October twenty first of two-thousand and eight. As business action item number five point thirteen came up the recommendation to accept the lowest and best bid of All Florida Fire Equipment Company came across the table and was accepted. The recommendation read that the bid was prepared at the request of the Safety and Risk Management Office to establish fixed pricing for the purchase and installation of the fire extinguishers. It also briefly talked about the money involved in this sort of project by noting the financial impact and saying it was budgeted and that approximately fifteen thousand dollars will be available in the Safety and Risk Management Office budget for the purchase and installation of the fire extinguishers.
In closing the experience actually taught me that there is a lot that goes into the process of working for a local government. While a person is asked to make buying decisions, they are also charged with the responsibility to not spend too much because the money they are responsible for is so precious. So while you want to buy the best you possibly can at the same time you are trying to save money for the other items you know are going to be needed down the line. I also had the experience of working with one of the most helpful people I have ever been in contact with in the government sector. Jean Bowman was so free and easy to work with she made asking questions and requesting documentation a breeze. In fact I have so many public records I probably have several more than I need but each and every one of them were very helpful in putting together this piece. In all I learned it is not easy to be in charge of the people’s money and make everyone happy at the same time, but I also learned despite that difficult task you can also be nice doing it.
Bowman thought the best case we could look at together would be the purchase of fire extinguishers, which was coded ITB # 8066-DST Fire Extinguishers. The ITB stands for invitation to bid on the purchase which is where we are going to begin. Bowman and her staff maintain a list of all potential bidders by category of commodity and include the names of all persons that request a placement on a particular bid. From that point sealed bids are requested for any single purchase of equipment or service that exceeds the bid amount specified in the State Board of Administration rules. These sealed bids shall be received at the time, date and place designated in the request for bids. Bids that are turned in after the designated time will not be accepted or considered. Each and every bid will be opened publicly by an employee of the school board and then the name of the bidder and the amount will be read aloud. Bowman then must evaluate the competing bids and make a recommendation to the school board for the award of the bid shall sign the tabulation. Under no circumstances will a bid be awarded to any bid other than the lowest and best bid from a quality bidder.
In the case of the fire extinguishers the invitation to bid originally came out on August fifth two-thousand and eight and had a due date of August nineteenth two-thousand and eight. The bid delivery location was the Hillsborough County Public County Schools Procurement Department at nine hundred and one East Kennedy Boulevard on the third floor in Tampa, Florida. All told there were five vendors bidding to provide the fire extinguishers to the Hillsborough County Public Schools. They were, listed in no particular order, as follows: A to Z Fire, All Florida Fire Equipment Company, Fire Master, Piper Fire Protection, and lastly Tampa Bay Fire Equipment, Inc. All of the vendors provided information and pricing on all twenty-eight items that were requested in the bid along with contact names and numbers to ask any questions about their offers. At the end of the day the lowest and best bid came from All Florida Fire Equipment Company out of St. Petersburg Florida. The final act to make this entire process official was for the Superintendent of schools, MaryEllen Eila to bring this to the Hillsborough County School Board for approval. That very thing happened on Tuesday October twenty first of two-thousand and eight. As business action item number five point thirteen came up the recommendation to accept the lowest and best bid of All Florida Fire Equipment Company came across the table and was accepted. The recommendation read that the bid was prepared at the request of the Safety and Risk Management Office to establish fixed pricing for the purchase and installation of the fire extinguishers. It also briefly talked about the money involved in this sort of project by noting the financial impact and saying it was budgeted and that approximately fifteen thousand dollars will be available in the Safety and Risk Management Office budget for the purchase and installation of the fire extinguishers.
In closing the experience actually taught me that there is a lot that goes into the process of working for a local government. While a person is asked to make buying decisions, they are also charged with the responsibility to not spend too much because the money they are responsible for is so precious. So while you want to buy the best you possibly can at the same time you are trying to save money for the other items you know are going to be needed down the line. I also had the experience of working with one of the most helpful people I have ever been in contact with in the government sector. Jean Bowman was so free and easy to work with she made asking questions and requesting documentation a breeze. In fact I have so many public records I probably have several more than I need but each and every one of them were very helpful in putting together this piece. In all I learned it is not easy to be in charge of the people’s money and make everyone happy at the same time, but I also learned despite that difficult task you can also be nice doing it.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Midterm
1.) In order to tell a compelling story about the trials and tribulations on Mr. Al Zimmerman I would first try to find out as much background information on him as possible. I would start by trying to find out if he had any history of criminal activity in his past by running a background check through http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/CriminalHistory/. This step would help determine if this is a problem with someone who just made some bad choices later in life or if there is a larger problem at hand involving a lack of proper investigation into the individuals applying for government based jobs. After receiving any and all information on Mr. Zimmerman I would then make it a priority to talk to anyone that had a hand in hiring him without doing the proper background checks. It turns out he had charges filed against him in the past for writing bad checks and driving under the influence. The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office website site http://www.hcso.tampa.fl.us/ was tremendously helpful in finding a ton of information on the exploits of all citizens including Zimmerman. In addition to the above steps I would try to find out his past, including where he was formerly employed and attempt to talk to some of the people that know him personally to see if they had any idea that he was capable of this type of behavior. I would look to have several questions answered and they are listed below: How did Zimmerman’s previous history of charges get overlooked in the interview process? What types of measures are going to be taken to insure that this kind of activity does not happen again in the future? Those two questions in particular I would be asking Mr. Bob Butterworth himself, chief of the Florida's Department of Children and Families. In addition to asking questions about Zimmerman I would also look to know what exactly goes into making sure an employee with the DCF is properly monitored and using funds for what they are supposed to be used for. This problem is larger than just an outlaw employee doing something illegal it is a black eye to the entire Florida government and should be viewed as such by Butterworth and all parties involved.
In addition to looking at this situation from a state government standpoint I also would look at it from a local citizen’s standpoint. While thinking along those lines I then used www.zillow.com to locate where this individual lives so that all the people that live in that surrounding area would know what kind of person lives among them. Throughout my search I found that there were many interviews done with people that claimed to have known Zimmerman very well and were shocked that he would be involved in these types of acts. So maybe the real story here is that you really never know people as well as you think you do. Along that line of thinking I would also try to do some research on his childhood and try to see if anything throughout his life would lead one to believe that he would commit this type of crime. To assist in this quest I would request a copy of the search warrant from the local police to see if anything they found would be helpful.
Lastly due to the fact this case is relating to sexual crimes we would not be able to obtain any information about the victims and that goes two fold because this case also includes minors. This would be yet another angle I would focus on and try to use this type of story to show both children and parents alike that in order to really know a person you have to take the time and do the research. This might sound like a very untrusting way to look at the world but anytime you are dealing with someone who is involved in shaping your life it is worth the time and effort to make sure you can trust them. My thought process in looking into all these different angles is to find an angle that has not been covered yet and I think by trying to pull all of these different public records and facts about Zimmerman it would give me a leg up in doing so. I found many different stories about this case but almost every single one of them was exactly the same and in some cases used the same quotes from the same people. If I were to do a story on something that is well documented I would want it to make an impact on the reader not just give them mind numbing stats that they can get anywhere.
2.) The Florida Sunshine Law is best known for allowing us, the Florida citizen, to obtain any records made or received by any public agency in the course of its official business. This is much different than much of the country as most state governments do not allow their citizens to have access to public records. Chapter one-hundred nineteen, the public records law, was passed in nineteen hundred and nine and allows for us to have the access to these public records. When it comes to the Sunshine Law there are a few things that are very important to remember. First anyone and everyone can get a public record, and secondly that person does not have to either give a name or a reason for the request. That being said there are many ways that state agencies sometimes try to get away with not giving someone the items they are requesting. From time to time they will ask for money to compensate them for their time, which is allowed but it must be the lowest paid employee’s salary that is paid. Other times they will say the item is not available or try to say they do not have access to it at the moment. That being said it can also go the other way and they can give you an unbelievable volume of records so large that no one could read all the information that is provided. This law also covers things like E-mails, faxes, computer documents and even discussions between public officials about government related business. We are tremendously lucky to live in a state that has this law, being a reporter is much easier in this state than the majority of the country.
Another key component to having an open government, in the state of Florida, is the commitment shown by Governor Charlie Crist. In June of two-thousand seven Crist issued executive order zero seven dash one-hundred and seven otherwise known as the Commission on Open Government Reform. The entire intent of the order was to ensure that all governments, both state and local, conform to Chapter one-hundred nineteen. It consists of nine members that will review, evaluate, and make recommendations in regards to Florida’s public records law. This committee would look at everything from whether fees should be charged or not in certain cases all that way to how records should be retained and distributed upon request. One of the major issues raised by the public was the publics right to obtain public records and how difficult some places make it to obtain these documents. This is one of the main reasons the governor enacted this plan, after hearing countless stories about how people attempted and failed to get the public records they needed and deserved, he felt he had to do something to make a change. Another major obstacle to obtaining public records is the cost associated with getting the records. During the third set of hearings several reporters stated that the cost is outrageous and more than that they are usually incompatible. The complaint stated that the different agencies rarely work together and never can help a citizen coordinate what they need when another department is involved. In fact by reading the various counts they were given it sounded like in most of the cases people were being intentionally difficult. Then the issue of cost comes up and in some cases the cost actually went up to hundred of thousands of dollars which is outrageous and just plain against the spirit of the law. The reporters claim that as technology increases it should be easier to obtain public records as less paper is used and it is stored much more easily than in the past. In their minds it is clear this all comes back to the government as a whole not feeling this is all that important and therefore not putting the proper time and effort into solving these issues. Another major and unacceptable issue also came up, and that was that some agencies are just flat out denying to provide the requested public record. In many of these cases they did not even give a reason but just would not provide it and other times stated it was due to proprietary information of the company that built the database. All this causes even a bigger problem than just having to pay for the information or wait a long time for it. More times than not these situation lead to a court case which ends up costing the requesting party loads of money not to mention could cause them to lose the timeliness of story. Yet another complaint that was provided was that many public records are only provided in a limited format. This also does not conform to the public records law as the public has the right to receive anything that is talked about when it comes to their local government. All this being said this entire discussion between the different media outlets and the Commission was not entirely about what is wrong but in some cases how what is wrong could be corrected. One person talked about how in other states when he was denied a public record he requested they are required to get permission from the attorney generals open records division. Another reporter, Matt Doig, Investigative Reporter, for the Herald-Tribune gave three simple requests that can help resolve some of the states issues with little effort or cost to the government. First they should just enforce the law that already exists by states just because an outside company is used to store information it does not mean it cannot be had. Secondly, the public should not have to pay for an outside company to pull the public records they are entitled to, they should be retrieved by someone making much less than a programmer for a private company. Lastly he stated that all databases should be built in a way they can be easily copied almost like coping a Word document from a computer to a CD. These suggestions and other just like it are the entire reason Governor Crist created this Commission. Through these sessions they are slowly but surely finding all the cracks and with each meeting also coming up with different ways to help resolve some of these problems. They are not going to be able to solve all of these issues overnight but they are on the right track and that is a step in the right direction.
3.) When State Senator Victor Crist announces his candidacy for Congress I would look into many aspects of his decision and his supports as well. While not trying to find dirt or anything of that nature my primary job would be to inform the voting public all I can about this new candidate. My first action would be to find where his money is coming from and I would do that through the website http://cqmoneyline.com/pml/home.do. The most important thing to remember when talking about or researching a politician is to follow the money. Money for an election can come from a variety of places and where they come from is sometimes just as important as how much. That being said after identifying who is providing this money I would of course look at the various relationships that he has and see if there is any unique things that jump off the page which could cause some concern. One example would be if a large group of people where providing money from the same company, in that case I would look at each one of their voting histories to see if this make sense or not. In order to find this information I would use the website http://www.opensecrets.org to see if anything is unusual or needs to be looked into a little deeper. For instance if of this large group of people only a handful of them have never voted before but now they were giving hundreds of dollars to a candidate that would be somewhat unusual. This would not necessarily be an issue for the candidate but it could certainly be an issue for the contributing party. Next I would go to the website http://election.dos.state.fl.us/index.shtml and make sure he is now a qualified candidate and all his papers are in order to run for Congress. After all these checks and balances have been completed I would get in contact with some of his major backers and try to find out why they believe in him so much and are willing to put so much of their hard earned money into his campaign. This will be helpful on two counts; on one hand if there is anything fishy going on it will help me determine what is happening. Secondly if everything is on the up and up I will truly get a better understanding as to why this person has such a loyal backing and will better be able to inform my readers as to the qualifications of the candidate. Our job as reporters again is not to find good things to report or bad things to report, it is to find everything to report and it is then up to us to decide what the public cannot get access to and give it to them. Another very interesting web site I found was http://www.followthemoney.org and it helps provide all the dollars by state and includes any kind of election you choose. This site also points out the different companies and how as they get bigger they start to contribute more and more. All told I would try to use all the resources at my disposal and try to make sure the public gets all the information they deserve about this individual.
In addition to looking at this situation from a state government standpoint I also would look at it from a local citizen’s standpoint. While thinking along those lines I then used www.zillow.com to locate where this individual lives so that all the people that live in that surrounding area would know what kind of person lives among them. Throughout my search I found that there were many interviews done with people that claimed to have known Zimmerman very well and were shocked that he would be involved in these types of acts. So maybe the real story here is that you really never know people as well as you think you do. Along that line of thinking I would also try to do some research on his childhood and try to see if anything throughout his life would lead one to believe that he would commit this type of crime. To assist in this quest I would request a copy of the search warrant from the local police to see if anything they found would be helpful.
Lastly due to the fact this case is relating to sexual crimes we would not be able to obtain any information about the victims and that goes two fold because this case also includes minors. This would be yet another angle I would focus on and try to use this type of story to show both children and parents alike that in order to really know a person you have to take the time and do the research. This might sound like a very untrusting way to look at the world but anytime you are dealing with someone who is involved in shaping your life it is worth the time and effort to make sure you can trust them. My thought process in looking into all these different angles is to find an angle that has not been covered yet and I think by trying to pull all of these different public records and facts about Zimmerman it would give me a leg up in doing so. I found many different stories about this case but almost every single one of them was exactly the same and in some cases used the same quotes from the same people. If I were to do a story on something that is well documented I would want it to make an impact on the reader not just give them mind numbing stats that they can get anywhere.
2.) The Florida Sunshine Law is best known for allowing us, the Florida citizen, to obtain any records made or received by any public agency in the course of its official business. This is much different than much of the country as most state governments do not allow their citizens to have access to public records. Chapter one-hundred nineteen, the public records law, was passed in nineteen hundred and nine and allows for us to have the access to these public records. When it comes to the Sunshine Law there are a few things that are very important to remember. First anyone and everyone can get a public record, and secondly that person does not have to either give a name or a reason for the request. That being said there are many ways that state agencies sometimes try to get away with not giving someone the items they are requesting. From time to time they will ask for money to compensate them for their time, which is allowed but it must be the lowest paid employee’s salary that is paid. Other times they will say the item is not available or try to say they do not have access to it at the moment. That being said it can also go the other way and they can give you an unbelievable volume of records so large that no one could read all the information that is provided. This law also covers things like E-mails, faxes, computer documents and even discussions between public officials about government related business. We are tremendously lucky to live in a state that has this law, being a reporter is much easier in this state than the majority of the country.
Another key component to having an open government, in the state of Florida, is the commitment shown by Governor Charlie Crist. In June of two-thousand seven Crist issued executive order zero seven dash one-hundred and seven otherwise known as the Commission on Open Government Reform. The entire intent of the order was to ensure that all governments, both state and local, conform to Chapter one-hundred nineteen. It consists of nine members that will review, evaluate, and make recommendations in regards to Florida’s public records law. This committee would look at everything from whether fees should be charged or not in certain cases all that way to how records should be retained and distributed upon request. One of the major issues raised by the public was the publics right to obtain public records and how difficult some places make it to obtain these documents. This is one of the main reasons the governor enacted this plan, after hearing countless stories about how people attempted and failed to get the public records they needed and deserved, he felt he had to do something to make a change. Another major obstacle to obtaining public records is the cost associated with getting the records. During the third set of hearings several reporters stated that the cost is outrageous and more than that they are usually incompatible. The complaint stated that the different agencies rarely work together and never can help a citizen coordinate what they need when another department is involved. In fact by reading the various counts they were given it sounded like in most of the cases people were being intentionally difficult. Then the issue of cost comes up and in some cases the cost actually went up to hundred of thousands of dollars which is outrageous and just plain against the spirit of the law. The reporters claim that as technology increases it should be easier to obtain public records as less paper is used and it is stored much more easily than in the past. In their minds it is clear this all comes back to the government as a whole not feeling this is all that important and therefore not putting the proper time and effort into solving these issues. Another major and unacceptable issue also came up, and that was that some agencies are just flat out denying to provide the requested public record. In many of these cases they did not even give a reason but just would not provide it and other times stated it was due to proprietary information of the company that built the database. All this causes even a bigger problem than just having to pay for the information or wait a long time for it. More times than not these situation lead to a court case which ends up costing the requesting party loads of money not to mention could cause them to lose the timeliness of story. Yet another complaint that was provided was that many public records are only provided in a limited format. This also does not conform to the public records law as the public has the right to receive anything that is talked about when it comes to their local government. All this being said this entire discussion between the different media outlets and the Commission was not entirely about what is wrong but in some cases how what is wrong could be corrected. One person talked about how in other states when he was denied a public record he requested they are required to get permission from the attorney generals open records division. Another reporter, Matt Doig, Investigative Reporter, for the Herald-Tribune gave three simple requests that can help resolve some of the states issues with little effort or cost to the government. First they should just enforce the law that already exists by states just because an outside company is used to store information it does not mean it cannot be had. Secondly, the public should not have to pay for an outside company to pull the public records they are entitled to, they should be retrieved by someone making much less than a programmer for a private company. Lastly he stated that all databases should be built in a way they can be easily copied almost like coping a Word document from a computer to a CD. These suggestions and other just like it are the entire reason Governor Crist created this Commission. Through these sessions they are slowly but surely finding all the cracks and with each meeting also coming up with different ways to help resolve some of these problems. They are not going to be able to solve all of these issues overnight but they are on the right track and that is a step in the right direction.
3.) When State Senator Victor Crist announces his candidacy for Congress I would look into many aspects of his decision and his supports as well. While not trying to find dirt or anything of that nature my primary job would be to inform the voting public all I can about this new candidate. My first action would be to find where his money is coming from and I would do that through the website http://cqmoneyline.com/pml/home.do. The most important thing to remember when talking about or researching a politician is to follow the money. Money for an election can come from a variety of places and where they come from is sometimes just as important as how much. That being said after identifying who is providing this money I would of course look at the various relationships that he has and see if there is any unique things that jump off the page which could cause some concern. One example would be if a large group of people where providing money from the same company, in that case I would look at each one of their voting histories to see if this make sense or not. In order to find this information I would use the website http://www.opensecrets.org to see if anything is unusual or needs to be looked into a little deeper. For instance if of this large group of people only a handful of them have never voted before but now they were giving hundreds of dollars to a candidate that would be somewhat unusual. This would not necessarily be an issue for the candidate but it could certainly be an issue for the contributing party. Next I would go to the website http://election.dos.state.fl.us/index.shtml and make sure he is now a qualified candidate and all his papers are in order to run for Congress. After all these checks and balances have been completed I would get in contact with some of his major backers and try to find out why they believe in him so much and are willing to put so much of their hard earned money into his campaign. This will be helpful on two counts; on one hand if there is anything fishy going on it will help me determine what is happening. Secondly if everything is on the up and up I will truly get a better understanding as to why this person has such a loyal backing and will better be able to inform my readers as to the qualifications of the candidate. Our job as reporters again is not to find good things to report or bad things to report, it is to find everything to report and it is then up to us to decide what the public cannot get access to and give it to them. Another very interesting web site I found was http://www.followthemoney.org and it helps provide all the dollars by state and includes any kind of election you choose. This site also points out the different companies and how as they get bigger they start to contribute more and more. All told I would try to use all the resources at my disposal and try to make sure the public gets all the information they deserve about this individual.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Public Meeting #3
On Wednesday October 8th 2008 I was able to attend a public meeting in regards to traffic calming on West Minnehaha Street in Tampa. This meeting was held a Leto High School cafeteria and the contact person was Steve Valdez. Jim Hunt was the hearing master of this meeting and he was joined by Jim Hosler and Robert Wood the project engineer. The intent of this meeting was to slow the ever increasing traffic due to the growing concern over the safety of the neighborhood children.
In order to get a meeting of this nature the public first must have a petition signed by at least five people. Once the petition is received by the county they then will try to select a time and location convenient for the people who signed the petition at hand. At this meeting they are required to have a hearing master, an official recorder of the responses, and lastly a videographer of the event. In some cases such as this an engineer of the proposed project would also show up to help answer questions posed by the attending public. To help explain the options to the public they also provided a description of the types of speed humps they have available to choose from. On the sheet that they had prepared it described the public’s options as a parabolic speed hump that was 3 inches high or a flat table speed hump that would have measured 3-1/2 inches high but would be flat instead of rounded off. The parabolic speed hump would allow the traffic to travel through the neighborhood at speeds of 15 to 20 miles per hour whereas the flat top table hump would allow cars to travel between 20 and 25 miles per hour. In addition to those differences the parabolic speed hump would cause a delay of approximately 10 seconds per car and the flat top speed hump would only cause a 5 second delay per car.
All that being said this is meeting had the attendance of zero. Not one person who signed the petition showed up and neither did anyone else. In my humble opinion this was a much needed act to help slow down the traffic in this area. Not only did it seem like a good idea but according to Hunt it was pretty much a slam dunk to get approved because all of the other roads in the surrounding areas had the speed humps in place already. This was still a very interesting meeting to attend because I got to see exactly how they handle situations like these. First of all they had to wait the maximum amount time, which was 30 minutes, to see if anyone showed up for the meeting. Due to the fact that we sat there the entire allotted time and no one showed Hunt looked into the camera and stated what the meeting was about and that due to the lack of attendance this request would not be approved. One last point to note was that even though absolutely nothing was accomplished at this meeting everyone in attendance still got paid, with exception of me of course. My point here is if you don’t find that something is worth showing up for then don’t sign a petition because you could end wasting taxpayers money, just like all these people did.
In order to get a meeting of this nature the public first must have a petition signed by at least five people. Once the petition is received by the county they then will try to select a time and location convenient for the people who signed the petition at hand. At this meeting they are required to have a hearing master, an official recorder of the responses, and lastly a videographer of the event. In some cases such as this an engineer of the proposed project would also show up to help answer questions posed by the attending public. To help explain the options to the public they also provided a description of the types of speed humps they have available to choose from. On the sheet that they had prepared it described the public’s options as a parabolic speed hump that was 3 inches high or a flat table speed hump that would have measured 3-1/2 inches high but would be flat instead of rounded off. The parabolic speed hump would allow the traffic to travel through the neighborhood at speeds of 15 to 20 miles per hour whereas the flat top table hump would allow cars to travel between 20 and 25 miles per hour. In addition to those differences the parabolic speed hump would cause a delay of approximately 10 seconds per car and the flat top speed hump would only cause a 5 second delay per car.
All that being said this is meeting had the attendance of zero. Not one person who signed the petition showed up and neither did anyone else. In my humble opinion this was a much needed act to help slow down the traffic in this area. Not only did it seem like a good idea but according to Hunt it was pretty much a slam dunk to get approved because all of the other roads in the surrounding areas had the speed humps in place already. This was still a very interesting meeting to attend because I got to see exactly how they handle situations like these. First of all they had to wait the maximum amount time, which was 30 minutes, to see if anyone showed up for the meeting. Due to the fact that we sat there the entire allotted time and no one showed Hunt looked into the camera and stated what the meeting was about and that due to the lack of attendance this request would not be approved. One last point to note was that even though absolutely nothing was accomplished at this meeting everyone in attendance still got paid, with exception of me of course. My point here is if you don’t find that something is worth showing up for then don’t sign a petition because you could end wasting taxpayers money, just like all these people did.
Steve Andrews, WFLA Investigative Reporter
Today we had the unique opportunity to spend some time with Steve Andrews, WFLA investigative reporter, at The News Center, in downtown Tampa. During this visit Andrews took the time to show us some stories he had done and then explained how he used public records to help bring these stories together. In addition to watching these stories we also got a brief tour of The News Center itself. While we could not get a first hand look at the studios we did have the opportunity to see a variety of areas that are essential to get the news out to the public daily.
Andrews showed us several stories, but the one that hit home with me was the one about an elderly man who was not given the proper care at an adult living facility. This story showed that by using public records you can not only tell a compelling story but help fix a gross injustice but getting the word out. He used the fact that many people did inspections of this facility and not one time did they see what kind of abuse this one particular patient had to endure. In addition he also found that a doctor that did see the patient many times also neglected to report the living facility for their lack of care. Another story he shared was about a about a water retention facility that had cracks all over the place. The public records he was able to gather for this story were extremely helpful in that he not only got documents but video as well. This video helped show that the project was not built to the specifications needed for it to be successful and last. After everything was said and done, fixing this problem could have been paid for by the citizens of Hillsborough County but due to Andrew’s efforts the battle wages on as to who is going to pay for this mess.
In all, this visit was both insightful and exciting in that we got the chance to see all the interworkings of a news room and the guts that makes reporting hard work. Andrews showed all of us that while it is viewed as glamorous to be on television it is also a tremendous amount of work. Many times during our visit he talked about how he had to comb through materials to find what he was looking for. These painstaking efforts showed in the quality of his work and is something we should all try to emulate in our chosen profession.
Andrews showed us several stories, but the one that hit home with me was the one about an elderly man who was not given the proper care at an adult living facility. This story showed that by using public records you can not only tell a compelling story but help fix a gross injustice but getting the word out. He used the fact that many people did inspections of this facility and not one time did they see what kind of abuse this one particular patient had to endure. In addition he also found that a doctor that did see the patient many times also neglected to report the living facility for their lack of care. Another story he shared was about a about a water retention facility that had cracks all over the place. The public records he was able to gather for this story were extremely helpful in that he not only got documents but video as well. This video helped show that the project was not built to the specifications needed for it to be successful and last. After everything was said and done, fixing this problem could have been paid for by the citizens of Hillsborough County but due to Andrew’s efforts the battle wages on as to who is going to pay for this mess.
In all, this visit was both insightful and exciting in that we got the chance to see all the interworkings of a news room and the guts that makes reporting hard work. Andrews showed all of us that while it is viewed as glamorous to be on television it is also a tremendous amount of work. Many times during our visit he talked about how he had to comb through materials to find what he was looking for. These painstaking efforts showed in the quality of his work and is something we should all try to emulate in our chosen profession.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Preston Trigg, Hillsborough County Tax Collector
Today we were joined by Preston Trigg of the Hillsborough County Tax Collector’s office. Trigg is the Director of Administration and Special Projects and took some time out of his busy schedule to go over some of the different requests he gets on a daily basis. He works closely with Doug Belden and helps with not only the various media requests but the tax paying public’s requests as well.
Some of the important facts he shared with us is that anyone can get a public record and they don’t have to give their name, a reason, or put the request in writing. While we have heard that from some of the other speakers we have had what we have not heard is that it might be a good idea to put our requests in writing. Trigg spoke from experience as he once was a reporter himself for the Tampa Tribune and used to make his requests in writing. The benefits of making your requests in writing is that it helps prove that you made a request in the first place and assists in mitigating errors in the request. When talking about accessing public records the subject of charges seems to come up a lot and he addressed that as well. He stated that the law allows extra charges for a large volume of records or a record requiring computer or programming time. After discussing the charges, we went over what types of documents we have the right to receive and the ones we don’t. Every document, email, tape recording and other government records start out as a public record that we have the right to inspect. That being said there are many exceptions, such as school records, (exam scores) items in that are in the process of an investigation, private emails, and most records involving juvenile records to name a few. Along with all of the knowledge he has gathered from his days in the tax collectors office he also shared some of the tricks he picked up as a reporter. He stated that main thing that all reporters should remember is to follow the money because that will usually lead you to a good story. The next bit of advice he picked up was from a former editor and that was to always check the facts because you never know who you can trust.
In closing this visit was one of the most helpful in getting me prepared to do a profile paper in the coming weeks. To this point we have had the pleasure to meet with many different people to prepare for our profile pieces but this one will set the wheels in motion. Both his experience and knowledge lead me to believe that if we follow the methods that he shared with us today we should all be successful.
Some of the important facts he shared with us is that anyone can get a public record and they don’t have to give their name, a reason, or put the request in writing. While we have heard that from some of the other speakers we have had what we have not heard is that it might be a good idea to put our requests in writing. Trigg spoke from experience as he once was a reporter himself for the Tampa Tribune and used to make his requests in writing. The benefits of making your requests in writing is that it helps prove that you made a request in the first place and assists in mitigating errors in the request. When talking about accessing public records the subject of charges seems to come up a lot and he addressed that as well. He stated that the law allows extra charges for a large volume of records or a record requiring computer or programming time. After discussing the charges, we went over what types of documents we have the right to receive and the ones we don’t. Every document, email, tape recording and other government records start out as a public record that we have the right to inspect. That being said there are many exceptions, such as school records, (exam scores) items in that are in the process of an investigation, private emails, and most records involving juvenile records to name a few. Along with all of the knowledge he has gathered from his days in the tax collectors office he also shared some of the tricks he picked up as a reporter. He stated that main thing that all reporters should remember is to follow the money because that will usually lead you to a good story. The next bit of advice he picked up was from a former editor and that was to always check the facts because you never know who you can trust.
In closing this visit was one of the most helpful in getting me prepared to do a profile paper in the coming weeks. To this point we have had the pleasure to meet with many different people to prepare for our profile pieces but this one will set the wheels in motion. Both his experience and knowledge lead me to believe that if we follow the methods that he shared with us today we should all be successful.
Monday, October 6, 2008
William March, Tampa Tribune
Recently we were visited in class by William March, chief political reporter for the Tampa Tribune. Mainly he spoke about how we can use the various tricks we have learned thus far in class to get information if we were to eventually cover politics. It seemed like he gets a lot of his information from the various websites he spoke about. That being said the most intriguing topic he discussed was the various stories he wrote and how he went about gathering the information.
The story that caught my eye the most was about the political contributions to the Bill Clinton campaign. He found that a business had given their employees roughly one thousand dollars apiece and strongly suggested to them that they contribute to the Clinton campaign. This of course is not allowed because the donation was really coming from that business owner not the folks doing the contributing. What was most intriguing about this piece was how the information was gathered. He took us to a variety of websites that showed not only the contributions but who made them and the exact dollar amounts. Then he used those same websites to show these individuals contribution history or lack thereof. It turned out in this case many of these individuals not only had never given a contribution before but didn’t even vote for the candidate they contributed to. This of course not only raised some eyebrows but lead reporters like March to start asking questions. All of this leads to several major convictions and the shut down of the company Future Tech International. Some of the websites he showed us were CQ Moneyline, Autotrack, and Open Secerts.org. All of these have not only been used to help break this story but many other stories over the course of time.
In all what we can take away from this visit was that we have many resources at our disposal to help tell a compelling story. The several examples he gave us help demonstrate what we can use these sites for and prove our point. In addition to the websites he showed us, he also explained some political terms to us that I had never heard. He stated that hard money is money that is donated directly to a candidate where soft money is donated to a party instead of a particular candidate. All of these little tidbits are what makes a story real and interesting to the reader. That being said many of the points he helped uncover during his presentation should be helpful for us going forward.
The story that caught my eye the most was about the political contributions to the Bill Clinton campaign. He found that a business had given their employees roughly one thousand dollars apiece and strongly suggested to them that they contribute to the Clinton campaign. This of course is not allowed because the donation was really coming from that business owner not the folks doing the contributing. What was most intriguing about this piece was how the information was gathered. He took us to a variety of websites that showed not only the contributions but who made them and the exact dollar amounts. Then he used those same websites to show these individuals contribution history or lack thereof. It turned out in this case many of these individuals not only had never given a contribution before but didn’t even vote for the candidate they contributed to. This of course not only raised some eyebrows but lead reporters like March to start asking questions. All of this leads to several major convictions and the shut down of the company Future Tech International. Some of the websites he showed us were CQ Moneyline, Autotrack, and Open Secerts.org. All of these have not only been used to help break this story but many other stories over the course of time.
In all what we can take away from this visit was that we have many resources at our disposal to help tell a compelling story. The several examples he gave us help demonstrate what we can use these sites for and prove our point. In addition to the websites he showed us, he also explained some political terms to us that I had never heard. He stated that hard money is money that is donated directly to a candidate where soft money is donated to a party instead of a particular candidate. All of these little tidbits are what makes a story real and interesting to the reader. That being said many of the points he helped uncover during his presentation should be helpful for us going forward.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Clerk of the Courts, Downtown Tampa
Today we got the experience of visiting the court of the clerks and in particular four members of the clerk’s office. Pat Frank is the clerk of the court but she is certainly not a one woman show. She is joined by a staff of over nine hundred to ensure the various duties of the clerk of the court get accomplished everyday. We spent some time with Pat, Dana Caranante, Director of Juvenile Court Operations, Douglas Bakke, and Director of Family Law Domestic Violence amongst other things. They spoke to what their areas do in helping the clerk of the courts operate on a daily basis.
Pat spoke at length about her role as both the Clerk of the Courts and Comptroller. As comptroller she is responsible for overseeing the funds that the county commissioners spend and dictates to them what they can spend. Currently she is handling a portfolio of about one point seven billion and that is on top of her duties as the clerk of the court. The three most important things to remember as a comptroller is, in order, return of principal, how liquid are the assets, and finally rate of return. Their duties as clerks of the court include keeping records of the court proceedings, collecting child support, issuing passports, and assisting with traffic tickets. I also found it very interesting that she said each year they give back to the county a ridiculous amount of money. In two-thousand and five they return eight million, in two-thousand and six it was nine point eight million and in two-thousand and seven with was still four point six million. That does not even take into account the sixteen million returned to the state for the clerks association. Overall she has many duties that have quite the effect on all of our everyday lives.
After speaking with Pat, three members of her staff spoke to us about their roles within the clerk of the court. We heard about the most requested documents from the court and the way the clerk of the courts handle these requests. Another unique thing they told us about was all the technology that has recently been added to make things easier. The main goal is to make life easier for the general public by making a lot of documents that are requested available online. In addition to making things available online they have setup kiosks to help the general public with some of their questions when visiting the courts.
In closing this was a unique experience and should prove to be valuable for all of us when doing our profiles. Not only did we get a better understanding of how the clerk of the court works but gained some perspective on what all goes into making a court system function. This was also valuable from a citizen’s point of view as a lot of this information could prove to be useful in the real world someday.
Pat spoke at length about her role as both the Clerk of the Courts and Comptroller. As comptroller she is responsible for overseeing the funds that the county commissioners spend and dictates to them what they can spend. Currently she is handling a portfolio of about one point seven billion and that is on top of her duties as the clerk of the court. The three most important things to remember as a comptroller is, in order, return of principal, how liquid are the assets, and finally rate of return. Their duties as clerks of the court include keeping records of the court proceedings, collecting child support, issuing passports, and assisting with traffic tickets. I also found it very interesting that she said each year they give back to the county a ridiculous amount of money. In two-thousand and five they return eight million, in two-thousand and six it was nine point eight million and in two-thousand and seven with was still four point six million. That does not even take into account the sixteen million returned to the state for the clerks association. Overall she has many duties that have quite the effect on all of our everyday lives.
After speaking with Pat, three members of her staff spoke to us about their roles within the clerk of the court. We heard about the most requested documents from the court and the way the clerk of the courts handle these requests. Another unique thing they told us about was all the technology that has recently been added to make things easier. The main goal is to make life easier for the general public by making a lot of documents that are requested available online. In addition to making things available online they have setup kiosks to help the general public with some of their questions when visiting the courts.
In closing this was a unique experience and should prove to be valuable for all of us when doing our profiles. Not only did we get a better understanding of how the clerk of the court works but gained some perspective on what all goes into making a court system function. This was also valuable from a citizen’s point of view as a lot of this information could prove to be useful in the real world someday.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
